are our rrr?
arrr!
Monday, December 14, 2009
Friday, November 20, 2009
Monday, November 9, 2009
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
Friday, September 18, 2009
Copypasta By: Anonymous
With ceiling cat as my witness
I solemnly swear
To sit on my throne
As the prince of Bel-Air.
Bitches don’t know
‘Bout my an hero
So they pray to Raptor Jesus
When I divide by zero.
I want delicious cake,
But it’s surprisingly far.
Jesus Christ it’s a lion
Get in the car!
Need moar mudkips
And fuck yeah Seaking!
I’m not really into
That Pokemans thing.
Do not want
Since you’re doing it wrong.
So I kill it with fire
And nom nom nom.
The internet hate machine
And a series of tubes.
Buy a dog
Or companion cube.
Everyday is Caturday
So do a barrel roll.
Don’t get b&
For being a troll.
There are over 9000
Corruptions of lol,
But only one blockatiel
That covers it all.
Once you have learned
A cat is fine too,
Then you will see
A winner is you.
Candlejack came
And…
I solemnly swear
To sit on my throne
As the prince of Bel-Air.
Bitches don’t know
‘Bout my an hero
So they pray to Raptor Jesus
When I divide by zero.
I want delicious cake,
But it’s surprisingly far.
Jesus Christ it’s a lion
Get in the car!
Need moar mudkips
And fuck yeah Seaking!
I’m not really into
That Pokemans thing.
Do not want
Since you’re doing it wrong.
So I kill it with fire
And nom nom nom.
The internet hate machine
And a series of tubes.
Buy a dog
Or companion cube.
Everyday is Caturday
So do a barrel roll.
Don’t get b&
For being a troll.
There are over 9000
Corruptions of lol,
But only one blockatiel
That covers it all.
Once you have learned
A cat is fine too,
Then you will see
A winner is you.
Candlejack came
And…
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Mental
it stems from a deep philosophical belief that everyone's values are wrong and they need to be shocked into awakening
and a strong foundation in humor
and a strong foundation in humor
labels:
capitalism,
god,
humor,
jesus,
patriarchy,
radical,
satan,
sex,
social construct
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
Sunday, May 24, 2009
Star Wars
I just realized this about Stars Wars:
1.) It's a complete patriarchy (Princess Leia couldn't have the force and be a Jedi? She's the child of Anakin too).
2.) It's so easy to go over to the dark side because the good guys resemble bad guys. Again, it's a patriarchal idea that fights must be won with brute force. When the real good guys come, they won't be wielding weapons.
1.) It's a complete patriarchy (Princess Leia couldn't have the force and be a Jedi? She's the child of Anakin too).
2.) It's so easy to go over to the dark side because the good guys resemble bad guys. Again, it's a patriarchal idea that fights must be won with brute force. When the real good guys come, they won't be wielding weapons.
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
Interpersonal Relations
"It is important to understand that the structure of capitalism itself is caught up in this process of distancing us from production and from producers. Marx saw this as a problem of human relations becoming more 'thing-like,' with attendant negative effects in the social realm..."
It's funny to me that people try to distract us from the real issue at hand. People in government and elsewhere point fingers at the internet and other technology as the cause of "more 'thing-like'" relations. Yet, think about a time before the internet, computers, and phones. People couldn't travel far very often; they had letter correspondences. Isn't this type of relation just as equally distanced as the type we have today? Today, people use the internet or telephones to communicate with people nearby, yes, but they also see those people on a daily or weekly basis. (For example, I make dinner plans or movie plans through cell phones, email, AIM, or Facebook.) But people are also communicating with people who they would never see normally because they live extremely far away. This is just the same as using snail mail to communicate at long distances, right? I mean, a long time ago, people were limited by modes of travel like cars and planes, so what has become "nearby" has probably expanded, but, overall, have our interpersonal relations changed that much? I would argue, in fact, that various forms of technology have allowed us to keep in contact with greater quantities of people than ever before.
Yet, people still try to point fingers at technology as being a detriment to society. And why do you think that is? Perhaps so that they can distract from the real social detriment--capitalism? Imagine if we knew that our shirt was made by child labor or that nonhuman animals were tortured so that we could eat eggs. We might be moved to protest, boycott, or change the system. Capitalism removes us from all of that. We are unable to have compassion for processes we do not see; we cannot walk in another being's shoes if we cannot see that being. And, as a result, we have lost our being-ity (my non-speciesist word for humanity). Isn't it funny, then, that the forces that argue that technology is hurting us are the very forces that benefit from a capitalist society?
It's funny to me that people try to distract us from the real issue at hand. People in government and elsewhere point fingers at the internet and other technology as the cause of "more 'thing-like'" relations. Yet, think about a time before the internet, computers, and phones. People couldn't travel far very often; they had letter correspondences. Isn't this type of relation just as equally distanced as the type we have today? Today, people use the internet or telephones to communicate with people nearby, yes, but they also see those people on a daily or weekly basis. (For example, I make dinner plans or movie plans through cell phones, email, AIM, or Facebook.) But people are also communicating with people who they would never see normally because they live extremely far away. This is just the same as using snail mail to communicate at long distances, right? I mean, a long time ago, people were limited by modes of travel like cars and planes, so what has become "nearby" has probably expanded, but, overall, have our interpersonal relations changed that much? I would argue, in fact, that various forms of technology have allowed us to keep in contact with greater quantities of people than ever before.
Yet, people still try to point fingers at technology as being a detriment to society. And why do you think that is? Perhaps so that they can distract from the real social detriment--capitalism? Imagine if we knew that our shirt was made by child labor or that nonhuman animals were tortured so that we could eat eggs. We might be moved to protest, boycott, or change the system. Capitalism removes us from all of that. We are unable to have compassion for processes we do not see; we cannot walk in another being's shoes if we cannot see that being. And, as a result, we have lost our being-ity (my non-speciesist word for humanity). Isn't it funny, then, that the forces that argue that technology is hurting us are the very forces that benefit from a capitalist society?
labels:
capitalism,
dissociation,
radical,
technology,
the internet
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
